The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and President of the Impeachment Trial, John Roberts, stepped in it big time yesterday when Senator Rand Paul petitioned the justice to ask the following question: “Manager Schiff and Counsel for the President, are you aware that House Intelligence Committee staffer Shawn Misko had a close relationship with Eric Ciaramella when at the National Security Council together, and are you aware and how do you respond to reports that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching the President before there were formal House impeachment proceedings?” Justice Roberts, who was outside his authority to do so, refused to read the question. Why? Because, without any authority, he said he would not read questions that reveal the name of the whistleblower. And so, by refusing to read this question, this specific name, Roberts confirmed the whistleblower is, indeed, one Eric Ciaramella (which everyone knows anyway).
Not amused with Roberts' obviously biased overreaching response, Senator Paul responded: “My question is not about a “whistleblower” as I have no independent information on his identity. My question is about the actions of known Obama partisans within the NSC and House staff and how they are reported to have conspired before impeachment proceedings had even begun. [A]nd are you aware and how do you respond to reports that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching the President before there were formal house impeachment proceedings?”
This is just too good of a story to let slip away without comment. The underlying drama of this story, which is something that will never likely see print in the New York Times or the Washington Post, is at the core of what the political kerfuffle the past three years has been all about. Whichever side of the fence you sit on, stick with me on this, because if little ole me has been able to connect the dots with a bit of internet investigation, then I guaran-damn-tee you that the President, his Attorney General, and the intelligence apparatus has known this for some time now. And if all of this is factual, even if it is just a summary tip of the iceberg, and if this matter has already been largely discovered through official investigations, then the President was absolutely and unequivocally within his authority to do diligence on the Biden matter in Ukraine.
Sometimes it is difficult to determine where reality departs from the smoke and mirrors of political combat, but I believe Senator Paul was attempting to flush out the matter into public view with his petitioned inquiry that was denied by Justice Roberts. Contrary to appearances, the President and those in the know in Congress actually wanted a plethora of witnesses to testify, while the Democrat House managers were walking a fine line to avoid any further questioning of certain clandestine characters they wish to remain sequestered. There is so much involved here that it was prudent to shut down the impeachment proceedings so as not to consume the Senate's time for an unforeseeable number of months ongoing, when all of this will ultimately be adjudicated through the justice system during the next months to years, without misdirecting Congress' focus from the people's business.
So why are the Democrats hiding Eric Ciaramella? Why is this man whose name must not be spoken such a pivotal figure in all of this?
In February 2014, there was a violent coup d'etat in Ukraine in which President Yanukovych was ousted and the United States succeeded in getting rid of another independently elected President of a foreign government. There was a horrific massacre in the main square of the capital Kiev where 100 people were killed. Strategically positioned snipers (who were Georgians under the control of globalist Shaakasvili) indiscriminately shot protesters and police alike in the streets from the windows of tall buildings surrounding the square. The coup was entirely organized at the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine, under the supervision of Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland at the direction of CIA Director John Brennan. It was CIA operative Eric Ciaramella, who spoke both Ukrainian and Russian fluently, who hired the snipers.
It was two months following the coup in early May 2014, that Hunter Biden was put on the board of Burisma, while Nancy Pelosi's son, Paul Pelosi, was put on the board of another Ukraine energy company. It was at the same time that John Kerry’s stepson, Christopher Heinz, ended his business relationship with Hunter Biden after turning down a similar offer that he perceived as being just too shady. (Biden and Heinz were at that time the co-owners of the private equity firm Rosemont Seneca Partners, where Heinz’ college roommate, Devon Archer, was a managing partner, also joining Biden on the board of Burisma.)
Following the coup, Biden traveled to Ukraine twelve times with his son Biden on Air Force Two, at taxpayer expense. Adam Schiff traveled to Ukraine multiple times with Eric Ciaramella. Until the Ukraine government that was friendly to the Russians was removed in the coup, there were no financial reimbursements made to American politicians. Once the CIA gone rogue installed new cooperative leadership that would kick back funds, John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, Adam Schiff, John McCain, and others in government began to see a percentage coming back to them whenever the American Congress allocated supportive funds to the new government.
These people are criminals. The deaths of a hundred Ukrainians is on them. The overthrow of the former government was for the sole purpose of enriching American politicians. That has been how foreign policy has been conducted during the nation building years of George Bush and Barack Obama. These same mercenary forces have been used again and again throughout the world and domestically to achieve results through rogue violence – think Las Vegas.
Donald Trump is stopping the violence and the as well as the lucrative gravy train with his different non-interventionalist approach to foreign policy. Those who have been benefiting have not only had their illicit income halted, but they have been found out and are soon to be held accountable by the Justice Department. Qanon has posted many times that “those who scream the loudest have the most to lose” - think Brennan, Nuland, Schiff, Biden, Kerry, and Pelosi. I think of a whole lot more, most of all the Clintons. Who else is involved? And how complicit is Obama? There is likely a whole rat's nest of evil that is on track to be rooted out. The President has voiced publicly that he knows all about it. AG Barr knows all about it, and directed official inquiry into the matter some time ago.
No wonder the Dems want everyone to stay far away from Eric Ciaramella. The truth always finds its way into the light. When it does, we can expect some large heads to roll.